The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [casi] Media war



Hi Sallydean,
Yes, I agree with you too. You said that (you can't blame them for
> controlling the media to try to get what they want. You can blame Arabs
for
> not putting their act together and acting in their own interests; they
don't
> do it. What Arabs need to realize is that they are educated, intelligent,
> wealthy (at least some Arabs) and numerous and if you put your act
together,)
Before speaking about Arab, I can say that India and China are through their
population are almost the quarter of the world, still they have not a media
that can win. According to the Arabs the wealth that comes from oil is in
the hands of a handful of Emirs, Shaikhes and Kings who are American agents
and want this state to continue. They would not allow establishing an
excellent media because their interests are with America. Sure you know that
a giant media company needs a real wealth and excellent know-hows. We in
Iraq tried, but! Again who will allow? I wrote in previous email that I was
invited to a conference in San Francisco, April-2001, about alternative
media. Tens of researches were discussed. But how can we fulfill our dreams?
There is no way.   CNN alone puts its hands on 95% from the news resources
in the world just imagine. Let us think about, may be we can success. Why
not.
Nermin




----- Original Message -----
From: <Sallydean22@aol.com>
To: <casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 6:45 PM
Subject: [casi] Media war


>
> [ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]
>
> Yes, Nermin, I agree.
> There is a shelf of books on the same topic at Exeter University Library,
and
> I would think in most academic libraries throughout the world, I think
most
> people who write agree that the Gulf War was "The Triumph of the Image
over
> Reality", where in the end, politicians and reporters were given untrue
facts
> which they debated, discussed, elaborated on, got excited about, and
spread
> to the ordinary person in the West.  I disagree that the incubator story
was
> important though, I don't think that people are won over by one image,
they
> are won over by repeating the same sort of story in many ways.  The media
> image against the Arab began long before the Gulf War, there were lots of
> books written showing how the world's press discriminated against the
Arab,
> that's what made it easy to turn the world against Iraq, the world had
been
> gradually bit by bit over centuries given the impression that the Arab is
not
> to be trusted, the Arab is inherently bad or foolish. (The most noted
> critique of Western attitudes to Arabs was Edward Said's Orientalism
> published in 1978). This same process continues to the present day.
> Populations everywhere including the West are controlled without force,
> making them think what the rulers want them to think, giving "consent" to
> things which are not in the interests of humanity. That's what makes it so
> easy for Sharon, Bush, etc to get their way when they are planning to do
> something which is incredibly wicked.
> Breaking this image is going to be a long, long job and it needs Arabs to
> unite in order to do it properly.  You can't blame Bush for following his
own
> interests (or for that matter, Sharon or Saddam) and you can't blame them
for
> controlling the media to try to get what they want.  You can blame Arabs
for
> not putting their act together and acting in their own interests; they
don't
> do it.  What Arabs need to realise is that they are educated, intelligent,
> wealthy (at least some Arabs) and numerous and if you put your act
together,
> YOU CAN WIN THE MEDIA WAR. Your "enemy" is the oil lobby and the
> Zionist/anti-Arab lobby in US/Europe (particularly US), but ARABS TOGETHER
> HAVE MORE RESOURCES THAN THESE LOBBIES HAVE.  YOU CAN WIN, YOU MUST WIN,
FOR
> HUMANITY.  But if you continue to squabble between yourselves, you might
as
> well give the Iraqi, Saudi, Iranian, Kuwaiti oil wells to Bush as a
present
> to go with his oil and gas pipeline in Afghanistan because in the end,
that
> is what he wants. If you aren't able to join together, you needn't even
> bother with a war, just lie down and die, or kneel at the feet of Bush and
> worship him and pledge your undying (or dying) support and say you will
live
> on peanuts and do everything he wants.  Why bother to lose bits of wars
which
> could go on for ages and cause a lot of hardship when you can get it all
over
> and done in one go; if you don't influence what's written in the
> Western/world media, you will never win. Either start now to fight the
media
> or you will all be crushed by the powers of USA, with the consent of the
> world.  We need a "Wake Up" call to Arabs in general so that rich and
poor,
> and every Arab nation, starts standing shoulder to shoulder, and saying,
> enough is enough, we want peace and justice for Arabs and all the people
of
> the world, and finding a way of getting that message through to the media
> together.  America and Israel between them have enough nuclear power to
wipe
> out the Arab states, these weapons are sited close to the oil states NOW,
and
> you can't believe that the consequences of a nuclear strike on Arabs would
be
> so bad that they wouldn't do it, believe me, they might, all they need is
an
> excuse, and that is why they are still going round telling everyone that
> Arabs are bad and mad, in so many words. So that when they want to press
that
> red button, no-one in the Western world will say "Well, no, I don't
agree".
> They will all say "Go ahead, that's just what those nasty Arabs deserve".
> Without Arab unity, no hope for Iraq, no hope for the Middle East, and if
> that happens, no hope for humanity.  This argument is not about the
> misrepresentation of Arabs in Iraq, it is about human rights for all.
> Judith.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
> To unsubscribe, visit
http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
> To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
> All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk
>


----- Original Message -----
From: <Sallydean22@aol.com>
To: <casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 6:45 PM
Subject: [casi] Media war


>
> [ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]
>
> Yes, Nermin, I agree.
> There is a shelf of books on the same topic at Exeter University Library,
and
> I would think in most academic libraries throughout the world, I think
most
> people who write agree that the Gulf War was "The Triumph of the Image
over
> Reality", where in the end, politicians and reporters were given untrue
facts
> which they debated, discussed, elaborated on, got excited about, and
spread
> to the ordinary person in the West.  I disagree that the incubator story
was
> important though, I don't think that people are won over by one image,
they
> are won over by repeating the same sort of story in many ways.  The media
> image against the Arab began long before the Gulf War, there were lots of
> books written showing how the world's press discriminated against the
Arab,
> that's what made it easy to turn the world against Iraq, the world had
been
> gradually bit by bit over centuries given the impression that the Arab is
not
> to be trusted, the Arab is inherently bad or foolish. (The most noted
> critique of Western attitudes to Arabs was Edward Said's Orientalism
> published in 1978). This same process continues to the present day.
> Populations everywhere including the West are controlled without force,
> making them think what the rulers want them to think, giving "consent" to
> things which are not in the interests of humanity. That's what makes it so
> easy for Sharon, Bush, etc to get their way when they are planning to do
> something which is incredibly wicked.
> Breaking this image is going to be a long, long job and it needs Arabs to
> unite in order to do it properly.  You can't blame Bush for following his
own
> interests (or for that matter, Sharon or Saddam) and you can't blame them
for
> controlling the media to try to get what they want.  You can blame Arabs
for
> not putting their act together and acting in their own interests; they
don't
> do it.  What Arabs need to realise is that they are educated, intelligent,
> wealthy (at least some Arabs) and numerous and if you put your act
together,
> YOU CAN WIN THE MEDIA WAR. Your "enemy" is the oil lobby and the
> Zionist/anti-Arab lobby in US/Europe (particularly US), but ARABS TOGETHER
> HAVE MORE RESOURCES THAN THESE LOBBIES HAVE.  YOU CAN WIN, YOU MUST WIN,
FOR
> HUMANITY.  But if you continue to squabble between yourselves, you might
as
> well give the Iraqi, Saudi, Iranian, Kuwaiti oil wells to Bush as a
present
> to go with his oil and gas pipeline in Afghanistan because in the end,
that
> is what he wants. If you aren't able to join together, you needn't even
> bother with a war, just lie down and die, or kneel at the feet of Bush and
> worship him and pledge your undying (or dying) support and say you will
live
> on peanuts and do everything he wants.  Why bother to lose bits of wars
which
> could go on for ages and cause a lot of hardship when you can get it all
over
> and done in one go; if you don't influence what's written in the
> Western/world media, you will never win. Either start now to fight the
media
> or you will all be crushed by the powers of USA, with the consent of the
> world.  We need a "Wake Up" call to Arabs in general so that rich and
poor,
> and every Arab nation, starts standing shoulder to shoulder, and saying,
> enough is enough, we want peace and justice for Arabs and all the people
of
> the world, and finding a way of getting that message through to the media
> together.  America and Israel between them have enough nuclear power to
wipe
> out the Arab states, these weapons are sited close to the oil states NOW,
and
> you can't believe that the consequences of a nuclear strike on Arabs would
be
> so bad that they wouldn't do it, believe me, they might, all they need is
an
> excuse, and that is why they are still going round telling everyone that
> Arabs are bad and mad, in so many words. So that when they want to press
that
> red button, no-one in the Western world will say "Well, no, I don't
agree".
> They will all say "Go ahead, that's just what those nasty Arabs deserve".
> Without Arab unity, no hope for Iraq, no hope for the Middle East, and if
> that happens, no hope for humanity.  This argument is not about the
> misrepresentation of Arabs in Iraq, it is about human rights for all.
> Judith.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
> To unsubscribe, visit
http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
> To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
> All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk
>


_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]