The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Friends, Tetchy f here again. However, President Bush and Vice President Blair have decided 1) that there should be a return to - forget the smart words, but something like 'benevolent colonialism' (eh???) and that, starting with Iraq's leader, they decide who is overthrown and who replaces them. QED? 2) Where is the rule of international law, the silent and pathetic UN, where will this dangerous duo go next? 3)Most importantly, any chance they will actually LET the people of these countries, who live and breathe the complexities, decide, however long it takes, for themselves - and we forget the minerals, oils, reginal control??? Any chance WE may return to the fold of international law? I dream that all I was taught at school of integrity of western values of law is not a lie. I fear my dreams are as the dust of the children of the Iraqi embargo (masqurading under the UN Convention on the Rights of the CHild) and I think we are on a slither to illegality which only history will record with sufficient disgust. I feel a blast urging restraint coming on - we are already talking nuclear - sorry. Warmest, f. ---------- >From: "nermin" <firstname.lastname@example.org> >To: <email@example.com> >Subject: [casi] Bush and Blair joint press conf. >Date: Sun, Apr 7, 2002, 11:46 am > > > [ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] > > Hi all, > > Hearing Bush and Blair in their joint press conference, I remembered that > western journalist who came to Baghdad in 1995 accusing Iraq is > undemocratic country. I asked him to define Democracy. He answered that in > his country they can write and say that their queen is a peace of > sh..(Sorry for this). So, I told him (this is not democracy but > unpolitness). Yet, day after one,it seems that definition is the democracy > of American Administration and friends. Through this democracy, Bush asked > Sharon to withdraw from west bank as soon as he can, although the > resolutions 1402 and 1403U SC asked him to withdraw immediately. And > through this democracy the both (Bush and Blair) decided to change Saddam!! > But no one can propose to change Bush even if he is an American although he > violates USA Constitution. And again because of this democracy the both > Bush and Blair are Noble peace prize nominees . May be in their democratic > style they will ask to add Sharon to be the third peace nominee.. Thanks to > that journalist who defined democracy! > > Nermin Al-Mufti, Baghdad > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. > To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss > To contact the list manager, email firstname.lastname@example.org > All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk > _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email email@example.com All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk