The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Article: For a lasting peace in Iraq

For a lasting peace in Iraq
By Leah C. Wells

When elephants fight, it's the grass that suffers. Two nations like the United States and Iraq have 
unlimited potential for rendering irreversible damage to each other, to the environment and to the 
innocent people who get trampled underfoot in the stampede of war.
As a pacifist, I do not endorse violence.

But let's imagine for a moment that I went along with the idea that removing President Saddam 
Hussein from power in Iraq was a good idea, that this action would decrease the cycle of violence 
in the world, and that it were a decent and honourable thing to do.

Imagine that we got rid of Saddam. Then what?

There are still 23 million people living in Iraq, so long as we did not kill a significant number 
of them in dethroning the infamous leader of the Ba'ath party. Among the Iraqis left standing are 
young men and women who have grown up in a decidedly anti-American environment, who have been 
nutritionally deprived since conscious memory and who are living daily with the threat of future 
bombings which have dotted the landscape, virtually escaping Western media reports for the past 
eleven years.

Are we naive to think that this same underdeveloped population that has endured hellishly hot 
summers, putrid water and abominable health conditions will now embrace American presence and show 
gratitude for our reinvigorated military effort against them?

Imagine for a moment that we stopped finger-pointing and blaming Saddam for starving his people for 
the past eleven years. Imagine that we stopped blaming a recalcitrant Sanctions Committee and 
policy making team from the State Department. Imagine that we viewed the humanitarian crisis in 
Iraq simply as people in need. The unending, maddening seclusion maintained by the world community 
could then be addressed.

What will we do for these civilian Iraqis with whom we have no argument, the unseen innocent 
survivors of an eleven-year siege?

A lasting peace plan in Iraq would have to begin by addressing the immediate needs of the average 
Iraqi people — their access to potable water, their educational infrastructure, healthcare system, 
their agriculture and oil industries — as well as their access to interstate and international 
travel. Restrictions on travelling to and from Iraq must be amended so that a dialogue may begin 
between Iraqis and other cultures throughout the world, starting with study abroad and student 
exchange programmes.

In Iraq, doctors need vaccines, syringes with needles, X-ray film and blood bags. Teachers need 
books and pencils. Children need shoes and a happy childhood. Nursing mothers need proper nutrition 
to provide a healthy start for young lives. Iraqis need a wider array of food options and 
nutritional intake other than the lentils and rice available under the oil-for-food programme.

Iraq needs an infusion of currency, a way to pay its citizens who desire to work, achieve and 
fulfil the demands of providing for their families. Immediately, Iraq needs a plan to rebuild its 
infrastructure — the water and sewage treatment plants and electrical facilities so that air 
conditioning and ceiling fans function when the temperature is 140 degrees.

We must accept responsibility for the life-altering consequences of our policies on people who 
should not have been targeted.

The world community, led by the United Nations, must apologise formally and publicly to the 
families who have lost loved ones as a result of the sanctions and no-fly-zone bombing campaigns in 
the North and south of Iraq. We must offer our sincerest condolences for our complicity in the 
crimes that killed more than half a million children.

Unless we do this, the civilian Iraqis who are not the enemy will have every justification for 
taking every opportunity to avenge the egregious wrongs done against them.

Gandhi tells a story about a wise man meditating by a river. A scorpion in a tree repeatedly falls 
into the water, and the wise man rescues him each time. And each time, the scorpion stings him. 
Another man sees this drama played out several times and approaches the wise man, asking why he 
continues to save the scorpion and risk being stung every time? “It is his nature to sting,” says 
the wise man. “I am a human. It is my nature to save.”

Iraq needs no new war, no more bombs. They need simple human-to-human outreach. That is the right 
thing to do.

The writer serves as Peace Education Coordinator for the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and travelled 
to Iraq last July with Chicago-based Voices in the Wilderness. She contributed this article to The 
Jordan Times.


Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at

Win the Ultimate Hawaiian Experience from Travelocity.;4018363;6991039;n?

Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit
To contact the list manager, email
All postings are archived on CASI's website:

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]