The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Dear All, I am also grateful for Glen's copious research and thoughtful response, as well as Colin's references on allegations of Iran's CW use in Halabja. I make additional points to further debunk "fog of war" claims (which are standard response of GOI officials queried about Iraqi CW use) and to provoke additional discussion. While Halabja is the most well-known CW attack site, dozens of other civilian sites were also hit by Iraqi military forces using combinations of CW, and possibly other agents, between March 1987 and October 1988. Human Rights Watch's "Genocide in Iraq" (Yale University Press, 1993) establishes, through eyewitness and Iraqi government documentation, that at least 40 other villages were attacked in a calculated scheme to depopulate rural areas providing support to Kurdish rebels. Research by Dr. Dlawer Ala'Aldeen ("Death Clouds: Saddam Hussein's Chemical War Against the Kurds" December 1991) and others, while not reflecting stringent HRW methodology, still identify almost 300 sites of alleged unconventional weapons attacks by Iraqi forces. The systematic use of CW agents by Iraqi forces, and motivations behind it, further bolster arguments against "fog of war" theories. What little forensic evidence exists also seems to point squarely at the Iraqi regime as the source of CW exposures. Soil samples from the Berzjini site near the Turkish border were confirmed by UK's Porton Down to contain mustard gas and the nerve agent sarin. The UN also documented use of the nerve agent tabun in Iran in its April 1988 report (referenced in Zanders publications highlighed by Colin). In addition to these potent weapons, Iraq is known to have weaponized many other chemical, biological and radiological agents at the time of the attacks in Iraqi Kurdistan. To my knowledge, there have yet to be systematic forensic sampling at known or suspected attack sites, begging the question of whether other agents were used. Given current concerns about WMD use, preparedness and low-level exposures, it would seem that this question is especially relevant. And, to provoke additional discussion among CASI participants, one might suggest that reported rising incidences of cancer, congenital abnormalities and other disorders throughout Iraq and among Gulf War veterans result from something more than exposure to DU. Is it folly to imagine that a systematic environmental and health assessment could ever be conducted anywhere in Iraq? Mike Amitay, Director =========================== Washington Kurdish Institute 605 G Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20024 202-484-0140 (tel) 202-484-0142 (fax) www.kurd.org -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email firstname.lastname@example.org CASI's website - www.casi.org.uk - includes an archive of all postings.