The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on terrorist attack on US by a former member of US armed forces



Could you please remove me from your list
----- Original Message -----
From: "Katy Connell" <kcnl@globalnet.co.uk>
To: "Eric Herring" <Eric.Herring@bristol.ac.uk>; "CASI list" <>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: Comments on terrorist attack on US by a former member of US
armed forces


> Eric -
>
> I agree that the crucial word when responding to your friend is
> "understanding". It clearly does not mean the same as "excuse", although
it
> is often confused. I can only speak for myself, but I suspect most people
on
> this list share the view that when we say we want to "understand" these
> events or place them in context this means we want to "work out why it
> happened" so that maybe we can prevent it happening again.
>
> The alternative to working out why it happened is to decide NOT to work
out
> why it happened. I wonder if your friend really wants this. Does he really
> want us never to work out what caused the hatred that led to these deaths?
>
> It is not only the fate of those who died that we have to think about. It
is
> also the fate of those who will die in future attacks. Such attacks will
> inevitably come should the US decide that it too wants to kill innocent
> people, firefighters and ambulance crews to even up the score.
>
> So there are at least 2 options:
>
> 1) US bombs Islamic countries causing inevitable civilian deaths, leading
to
> increased hatred of the US and further attacks both ways.
>
> 2) The US comes to terms with the hatred that millions in the Middle East
> and elswhere have towards its policies, works out what is wrong, and
starts
> to change those policies to reduce hatred and attacks.
>
>
> >"Understanding" the alleged provocation to attack thousands
> >and thousands of innocents can never be accepted.  Why?
> >Because when these requests for understanding are taken in
> >context they are nothing more than an endorsement of the
> >attacks.
>
> I can understand why the US imposes sanctions on Iraq, but I don't endorse
> them. I can understand the hatred that led to the September 11th attacks,
> but I don't endorse that either.
>
> >Understanding gives weight and legitimacy to the
> >attack because to "understand" is to accept they might have
> >had what they considered a "reason" for the attack.
>
> Does your friend think that the perpetrators considered that they had no
> reason for the attack? I can only think they thought they did indeed have
a
> reason. The only alternative is that they just did it out of boredom. I
> don't think that likely.
>
> >After all, according to
> >CASI posters, no amount of reasoning is sufficient to cause
> >the innocent to suffer.
>
> I don't know which posters he is talking about. Certainly not me. I'm sure
> we can imagine situations where there is no choice but for some people to
> suffer in order that others are saved. Just so happens that the case of
Iraq
> sanctions is not one of them, in my opinion, and I suspect most people on
> the list.
>
> >But somehow we must understand the reason cowards murdered
> >of thousands in the United States?
>
> Given the alternative. And if you want to stop it happening again, yes.
>
> >In the case of the
> >terrorist attack on the 11th of September we are to
> >overlook the evil act and accept the provocation?
>
>
> No. That would be lunacy.
>
> >This is lunacy.
>
> No one has said the act should be overlooked. Quite the opposite -- we
> should learn valuable lessons from it. But the lesson should not be that
the
> US must kill innocent people to try to teach others that killing innocent
> people is wrong.
>
> Glenn Bassett.
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
> For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk
> CASI's website - www.casi.org.uk - includes an archive of all postings.
>

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk
CASI's website - www.casi.org.uk - includes an archive of all postings.


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]