The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FW: IRAQ UPDATE [9-16-01] Now IS the Time To Speak for Peace

fyi - f.

Hello, all. Please read this piece, which articulates what is at stake.
Please forward it widely. Please continue to check out on a regular basis. Within 24 hours, it will be
revamped as a crisis page with information resources, action ideas, and
coordination. And remember there is persistent talk about bombing Iraq, as
well as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, and Iran.

In Solidarity,

Iraq Update

Now IS the Time to Speak for Peace

Published on Monday, September 17, 2001

by Robert Jensen and Rahul Mahajan

The Bush administration has stolen from us the time to grieve.

Americans, and people all over the world, should have had time to grieve
for the victims of last week's attacks. But the politicians have made it
clear they want war -- on anyone, at any price, with seemingly no thought
about the consequences -- and we have no choice but to begin speaking out
and organizing as we grieve.

Those who speak against war face hostility from many Americans -- including
even some in the peace movement -- who say, "Now is not the time to talk
politics; the country needs to heal."

As one person put it in an email to us, "Sometimes to hold our tongues is
far better than to voice our opinions."

But now IS the time to talk politics, before it is too late.

 From the first day of this tragedy, the leadership of this country --
amplified by the hawkish tone of most of the media coverage -- has made it
clear they see an opening to ram through a military "solution" to the
terrorism problem. They seem to believe this strategy will further
consolidate U.S. power, especially in the Middle East.

Their claim to be acting to protect Americans rings hollow. Will Americans
be safer if the U.S. unleashes its own "holy war" against -- against whom?
where? ending when?

The people calling the shots would prefer that citizens argue about whether
we should seek vengeance or not. But the politicians' goal is not mere
vengeance; these are not the days when nations go to war to settle a grudge.

It is time to face some difficult truths: The war being planned is not
about the emotions of citizens and their leaders spinning out of control.
Yes, people are angry, and many are hungry for revenge. But that is merely
a cover for the politicians.

Like all wars involving great powers, this is a war about geopolitical
strategy. It is a war that aims to extend the dominance of the United

A lesson from the Gulf War is crucial: The United States said it wanted
Iraq out of Kuwait, but U.S. officials blocked any possibility of a
diplomatic solution to the crisis caused by Iraq's illegal invasion. The
first Bush administration wanted a war, and it got one. And that war gave
the United States even greater dominance over the Middle East.

Now the current Bush administration says it wants Osama bin Laden. No doubt
everyone would like to see bin Laden out of commission. But we fear that
the administration is after something far beyond that. Remember that the
talk in Washington is not just of nabbing bin Laden; it's about "rooting
out" his terror networks and waging a global "war on terrorism." In other
words, an unending counterinsurgency against any part of the Islamic world
that does not accept U.S. supremacy.

Ponder that: An indefinite war waged against an entire culture.

The history of empires -- and make no mistake, we must understand the
United States as an empire, though with a different method of control than
the empires of old -- suggests that the drive to greater power and
dominance is never satisfied.

But the other lesson of history is that empires eventually take on more
than they can handle. There is a recklessness in the air; officials talk
openly about going after "high-value targets," such as capital cities, in
countries that may "harbor" terrorists.

The first effect of any such attack, other than killing massive numbers of
innocent civilians, will be to multiply tenfold the number of people in the
Islamic world willing to die to wreak havoc on the United States. If fewer
than two dozen people, supported by a few hundred more, could carry off
last week's attacks, what will happen when we arouse the anger of 1 billion
people by a blatantly unjust and destructive "retaliation?"

Ordinary people, feeling the danger, are flocking to peace demonstrations
in unexpected numbers. But without organization, those efforts will die
down as people attempt to return to their normal lives -- while we enter a
cold new world of ongoing fear, hatred, and war.

Our government is starting down the road to potential disaster. The time to
act is now.

Robert Jensen is a professor of journalism at the University of Texas.
Rahul Mahajan serves on the National Board of Peace Action. Both are
members of the Nowar Collective ( They can be
reached at

This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
For removal from list, email
CASI's website - - includes an archive of all postings.

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]