The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
One has to exercise some care when interpreting the phrase 'in support of' (see extract from Colin's e-mail below). In particular, it's worth noting the following facts regarding the imposition of the southern no-fly zone in August 1992: 'The formulation used in announcing the no-fly zone made no mention of defending or protecting Iraqi civilians. According to a Pentagon spokesman, 'The purpose of establishing the no-fly zone - and I would emphasise it's a no-fly zone, not a security zone - is to ensure the safety of coalition aircraft monitoring compliance with United Narions Council Resolution 688.' ('Sanctioning Saddam' by Sarah Graham-Brown, page 109). >The US and UK governments do not, though, claim that 688 gives them the >right to "bomb at will". Their formula is somewhat more subtle: the no fly >zones are actions taken "in support of" 688. Their actions are as well: >their rules of engagement only allow force to be used in response to >threats. Their rules do, however, allow the response to come at any time >after the original threat, and to be directed against any element of the >system that threatened them. Effectively, of course, this allows them to >attack Iraq's air defenses "at will". > >Yet this also presents a real problem from the point of view of their >ability to "support" 688, which called for the Iraqi government to cease its >repression of Iraq's civilian population: I have yet to read of a human >rights violation in Iraq that has involved the perpetrators targetting >passing US or British planes with radar. Thus, the zones seem largely >incapable of supporting 688, even in spirit. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website: http://www.casi.org.uk