The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Media manipulation? Regarding the "Wisconsin Project" ...

Title: Media manipulation? Regarding the "Wisconsin Project" ...
Dear folks,
In his analysis, Jeffrey writes that

>A previous report from the Wisconsin Project alleging Iraq had carried out a successful nuclear test was published in >newspapers across the United States on June 10. On June 11, the chief UN arms inspector Hans Blix said there had been >no nuclear tests and that "the information is totally wrong." Terry Wallace, professor of Geosciences at the University of >Arizona, said there was no reason to believe the story is "anything but a hoax." Reuters distributed this piece that was >picked up by a small number of newspapers in the U.S.

Now, according to Reuters (see below), these comments by Blix and co. were in response to allegations made in the Sunday Times and BBC2's Correspondent programme back in *February*. Does anyone know the source of the Wisconsin Project's June 11 allegations? Were they just picking up from these earlier reports?

Best wishes,



UNITED NATIONS, June 11 (Reuters) - The chief U.N. arms inspector and
experts at a London think tank have concluded there was no evidence
Iraq had carried out a successful nuclear test in 1989, as alleged in
news reports earlier this year.

Hans Blix, the executive chairman of the U.N. Monitoring,
Verification and Inspection Commission, said he reported to the U.N.
Security Council last week "the information is totally wrong" that
Iraq conducted a nuclear test beneath Lake Rezazza, southwest of
Baghdad on Sept. 19, 1989, before the Gulf War.

He told reporters his department and the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) had evidence in its files, from overhead flights and
previous ground inspections "there had been no nuclear tests" nor a
tunnel under the lake.

Purported evidence of a test, from two defecting former scientists in
Iraq and an interpretation of satellite photographs of the test area,
was reported in London's Sunday Times newspaper in February and
received fairly wide coverage.

Terry Wallace, a professor of Geosciences at the University of
Arizona, says that while it is far easier to prove something did
happen than to prove it did not there was no reason to believe the
story is "anything but a hoax."

An examination of global earthquake catalogues, produced by the
International Seismic Center and U.S. Geological Survey, revealed no
significant seismic activity in Iraq the day the test was alleged to
have taken place, Wallace said.

Such an explosion he said, in an article for the London-based think
tank, the Verification, Training and Information Center, would have
been easily detectable by international or by regional monitoring in
Iran, Israel or Jordan, which keep records of earthquakes.

None of them reported any seismic events of the magnitude necessary
for a nuclear test in the region around Lake Rezazza, Wallace said.
U.N. arms inspectors have not been permitted to track down Baghdad's
weapons of mass destruction since mid-December 1998, when they were
withdrawn shortly before the United States and Britain launched a
four-day bombing campaign prompted by Iraq's failure to cooperate
with the arms teams.

Blix's agency has now signed a contract with a private, satellite
firm and is restarting overhead flights this month.

Earlier this year, Western intelligence agencies alleged that Iraq
had reconstituted parts of its banned arms programs. The German
Federal Intelligence Agency (BND) in February told selected reporters
Iraq could produce a nuclear device in three years and fire a missile
as far as Europe by 2005.

U.S. and British officials alleged in January that Iraq had rebuilt
three factories capable of producing chemical and biological weapons.
The IAEA, meanwhile, carried out its annual inspection of the Iraq's
Tuwaitha nuclear power center in January and reported that low-grade
nuclear material held there had not been moved since its last visit.


-----Original Message-----
From: Hamre, Drew <>
To: '' <>
Date: 11 July 2001 19:06
Subject: Media manipulation? Regarding the "Wisconsin Project" ...

During the heat of the recent 'smart sanctions' debate, a flurry of news reports claimed that Iraq had been evading sanctions and buying weapons. The reports cited the "Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control", a putative watchdog group, whose findings were presented as based on unpublished arms inspection data.

The true story is more murky, as Jeffrey Weiss uncovers below. 

I should add that the AP (whose June 19 story Weiss investigates) was actually 'scooped' on this story by the NYTimes' Barbara Crossette, who reported a day earlier.  In fact, the Wisconsin Project has been cited by - or been the basis of - stories by Crossette at least four times since 1996.

Below is a) Weiss's report, b) a listing Crossette/Wisconsin Project stories (NYT search engine), and c) Crossette's June 18 report.


Published on Wednesday, July 11, 2001
Media Deception & Iraq
by Jeffrey Weiss
The Associated Press released a story on June 19, written by Edith Lederer, that was published in many newspapers in the United States alleging that Iraq was importing weapons despite economic sanctions. I conducted a brief study to find out the genesis of the article.

The local Des Moines Register picked up the AP story from the wire and gave the title: "Iraq evades arms sanctions, U.N. reports say." The story was based upon findings by Gary Mihollin, director of the Washington-based Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. According to the group, Iraq "evaded U.N. sanctions in the 90s importing weapons from companies in Eastern Europe and Russia."

The "UN Reports" cited in the headline were in fact, according to the text of the story, "unpublished" reports released by "U.S. arms-control researchers" who got them from "sources outside the United Nations."

The category of "weapons" provided by companies in the study is never identified; AP writer Edith Lederer, however, makes a reference to Iraq's "nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs."

On June 25 I called Edith Lederer in Washington, D.C. at the AP bureau. The conversation went like this:
Edith: "I can answer one question and give you 15 seconds of my time so hurry."
Jeffrey: "Have you ever seen the unpublished U.N. report that is the subject of the story?"
Edith: "No."
Jeffrey: "Have you ever read any of the text of this unpublished report that is the focus of your story."
Edith: "No."
Jeffrey: "Do you think I can get a copy of this report from Gary in Wisconsin?"
Edith: "I doubt there is any chance that could happen .. Gary is a friend."
Jeffrey: So how do we know this report exists?
Edith: You can read the story in Commentary magazine
Jeffrey: "I looked upon the web site and found out the Wisconsin Project's Iraq program is funded in part by the Pentagon. You describe them as a non-profit watchdog group.

Edith: "I have to go now, but you can find the story in the Commentary."

On June 26, I got an e-mail response from the Wisconsin Project on my request for the report. According to Kelly Motz, the "report (she put the words in quotes!) is "actually an article in Commentary magazine."

Commentary, for those who don't know, is published by the American Jewish Committee. The July/August issue includes an article, "Shopping with Saddam Hussein," by Milhollin and Motz. The piece relies upon "confidential" reports before 1998 from "UN inspectors" ostensibly interviewed by the authors but never identified.

If the report was written, it was during the years the U.S. and U.K. acknowledged they had stacked UNSCOM with intelligence officers. A further irony is that the top weapons-inspector at the time of this report, former Marine Scott Ritter, says Iraq is "qualitatively disarmed" and that "there can be no honor in a policy that that leads to the death, through malnutrition and untreated disease, of 5,000 children under the age of 5 every month." (Boston Globe, 3-9-2000)

The AP story describes the Wisconsin Project as a "nonprofit watch-dog group" but fails to include a passage from the organization's web site: "In the year 2000, the Project launched a joint effort with the Pentagon to improve export controls in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe."

The story gets better.

A previous report from the Wisconsin Project alleging Iraq had carried out a successful nuclear test was published in newspapers across the United States on June 10. On June 11, the chief UN arms inspector Hans Blix said there had been no nuclear tests and that "the information is totally wrong." Terry Wallace, professor of Geosciences at the University of Arizona, said there was no reason to believe the story is "anything but a hoax." Reuters distributed this piece that was picked up by a small number of newspapers in the U.S.

Every year UN agencies such as UNICEF and the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) release reports providing statistics of the deaths of children in Iraq under economic sanctions but they don't appear in many papers (see the work of Project Censored). Unfortunately, "UN reports" from the Wisconsin Project are deemed legitimate.

Jeffrey J. Weiss <> is the Education Director/Central Region for the American Friends Service Committee, 4211 Grand Avenue/Des Moines, IA 50310515-274-4851, ext. 16 or 515-255-2465.

Date: June 18, 2001, Monday
U.N. Sanctions Didn't Stop Iraq >From Buying Weapons
Two American arms control experts, combing through unpublished reports by a disbanded arms inspection commission, say they fo...


Date: December 18, 1999, Saturday
Divided U.N. Council Approves New Iraq Arms Inspection Plan
A divided Security Council voted today to create a new arms inspection system for Iraq with the promise to President Saddam H...


Date: December 19, 1998, Saturday
ATTACK ON IRAQ: THE MONITORS; U.N. Is Urged to Plan For Nuclear Inspections
When the bombing of Iraq ends, arms control experts say, the United Nations Security Council should not abandon inspections b...

Date: August 13, 1998, Thursday
Toughening Stand on Weapons, Iraq Foils Long-Term Monitoring
Iraq is not only freezing all current United Nations weapons inspections but is also threatening the long-term monitoring tha...

June 18, 2001
The New York Times

U.N. Sanctions Didn't Stop Iraq From Buying Weapons

UNITED NATIONS, June 15 - Two American arms control experts, combing through unpublished reports by a disbanded arms inspection commission, say they found evidence that Iraq continued to buy prohibited weapons or parts long after United Nations sanctions were imposed in 1990.

Many of the purchases appear to have been made in Central and Eastern Europe, the experts, Gary Milhollin, director of the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control in Washington, and Kelly Motz, a project researcher, say in a new independent report. They found documents concerning illegal sales or potential sales by companies in Ukraine, Belarus and Romania. Among the purchases made by the government of Saddam Hussein were missile components and high- technology machine tools.

In the past, United Nations arms inspectors for Iraq had been reluctant to identify countries in public reports, in part because there have also been suspicions of illegal trading by companies in Russia, a powerful member of the Security Council.

The report by the Wisconsin Project, to be published on Wednesday in the magazine Commentary, appears as the United Nations Security Council is debating a new "oil for food" program for Iraq that would lift most restrictions on sales of civilian goods to Iraq.

The Council is stymied over American insistence that, given Iraq's past subterfuges in acquiring weapons of mass destruction, the plan must include an extensive list of items that could only be sold after a review to make sure they were not intended for military use.

"What this shows is that Saddam's procurement network is alive and well and has been working steadily despite the sanctions," Mr. Milhollin said in an interview on Thursday. "To stop it, we need to do better.

"There are a lot of companies out there willing to break the embargo, and they're also going to be willing to take advantages of weaknesses in this list, which means the list ought to be as strong as we can make it. Given his proclivities to divert things and to stop selling oil for his people in order to leverage us out of controlling his money, if there are going to be mistakes made, we ought to make them on the side of being more careful about what he is allowed to buy."

The sanctions were imposed on Iraq in 1990, after it invaded Kuwait. The oil for food program allows Iraq to sell oil to alleviate suffering of the civilian population under the sanctions. The United Nations monitors expenditure of the profits, with part going to Kurds in the north and reparations for the Persian Gulf war.

France, Russia and China are objecting to the American list of items that would have to be reviewed under the broadened program.

They contend that some items, beyond clearly prohibited arms, are unnecessarily restrictive and will prolong hardships in Iraq that the new oil-sales plan was intended to alleviate.

Some independent experts say United States intelligence agencies are trying to keep certain items out of Iraq that it could use to make American eavesdropping harder, if not impossible.

In negotiations this week in Paris and New York, the Americans agreed to trim the list somewhat, diplomats said. But continuing disagreements over its scope it could cause the Council to miss another deadline, July 3, for establishing the new oil-sales program.

In their article, Mr. Milhollin and Dr. Motz dismiss the debate over the new plan as largely irrelevant. "The new proposal - whether adopted by the U.N. or not - has little hope of stopping the Iraqis from sneaking in what they need to rebuild their weapons sites and sneaking out the oil to pay for it," they wrote. "For the truth is that even when the U.N. inspections regime was in place, the Iraqis had figured out how to do just that."

Iraq continues to argue that it has disarmed as required by the Security Council and that sanctions should be lifted without further preconditions. Russia and France, the Council members with the closest ties to Iraq, say that while an automatic lifting of sanctions is not possible, Iraq should be told clearly what it still needs to do so that sanctions can at least be suspended as soon as possible.

A United Nations commission was set up after the gulf war to monitor Iraq's weapons, but the inspectors were withdrawn in late 1998, in advance of American and British bombing of Iraq. It was that commission's documents that Mr. Milhollin and Dr. Motz reviewed.

A new arms inspection system was established, but this week its director, Hans Blix of Sweden, told the Security Council again that inspectors from his new United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission must go to Iraq before a suspension can be considered. Mr. Hussein has barred them.

"The completion of both the inventory of unresolved disarmament issues and the identification of the key remaining disarmament tasks," he wrote in a report to the Council, "will only be possible after the commission's experts have commenced work in Iraq and have been able to assess what changes may have occurred during the almost two-and-a- half years when there have been no on-site inspections or monitoring in Iraq."

Among the examples drawn from the documents of the now defunct United Nations Special Commission was a case that began in 1995 when a delegation of Iraqi specialists from the Badr State Establishment, which made sophisticated machine tools, arrived in Belarus with a shopping list that included diamond-cutting tools. They can be used for making precision parts for nuclear weapons and long-range missiles. Those tools and other materials were bought outside United Nations rules, the authors say, and shipped to Iraq by way of the Jordanian free-trade port of Aqaba.

As late as 1998, before arms inspectors were withdrawn from Iraq, the Wisconsin Project article says, United Nations experts saw high- technology lens-making machinery from Belarus being unloaded in Iraq. In Ukraine, the Iraqis wanted to acquire whole laboratories, with training assistance and computer software. The Iraqis say they never made the purchases, and United Nations inspectors never found evidence of them at missile sites or other places.

Ukraine continues to be publicly active in Iraq, however. This year, according to news reports from Kiev, more than 100 Ukrainian companies, some selling space and aviation equipment, exhibited their goods at a Baghdad trade fair.

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]