The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
With reference to Colin's comments (see below) about the media, I don't think we can count on the media to not play this as "the end of sanctions", partcularly the TV and Radio. C4 news take on thhe story last week was UK and US proposing end to sanctions, Saddam refuses"
With this in mind folk whho can speak about this should get on the phone to the BBC, ITN as soon as the new resolution is tabled, offering services as speakers. Otherwise, the TV and Radio will be packed out with conservative think tankers, the Internation Instiitue for Strategic Studies and all that gang, and we know what they'll say......
Voices in the Wilderness
Colin Rowat <email@example.com> wrote:
Thanks for the updates Gabriel - and congratulations on your recent letter
to the editor. You are concerned that "the spin is certainly working".
There are some reasons to hope that it may not end up this way.
First, some of the more sobre news outlets are much less impressed. The
Financial Times' article used the proposals as an opportunity to outline
Iraq's more pressing civilian needs, clearly indicating that the proposals
failed to meet them. Evelyn Leopold's (Reuters) line about the new
proposals allowing everything from "bicycles to sewing machines" into Iraq
more easily has stuck with me: this makes it clear what a joke this is. I
think that at least one serious weekly news magazine may be running
similarly critical commentary next week.
Second, no one that I've spoken to (UN Iraq people, and diplomats from two
countries, including one officially selling the proposals) thinks that the
proposals are either feasible (e.g. bringing the front line states on board)
or likely to offer much humanitarian improvement.
Last, but perhaps most importantly: there is a large community of people who
are both informed and concerned. We're responding quickly and
These cracks do not bode well for these proposals. Furthermore, their
infeasibility means that the US could take a real soaking on them.
Let's keep up the pressure!
|work| 269 Mercer Street, Room 710 | Department of Economics | New York
University | New York, NY 10003, USA | (212) 998 8939 |
http://homepages.nyu.edu/~cir2 | firstname.lastname@example.org
|home| 274 Vanderbilt Ave., #2 | Brooklyn NY 11205, USA |
|tel/fax| (917) 517 5840 (mobile) | (707) 221 3672 (fax) |
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
For removal from list, email email@example.com
Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website: