The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Paul Wolfowitz (1) is the new U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense, the second highest Pentagon position (2). Below see a letter from the "Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf," a group that in 1990 lobbied for the use of force against Iraq (3). This letter advocates a "no-drive" zone and other regime change proposals. Along with Wolfowitz, a long-time regime change advocate, notable signatories include: Robert C. McFarlane (http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iran/overview.htm) Martin Peretz (http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/2000/msg01113.html) Donald Rumsfeld (http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/rumsfeld.html) Caspar Weinberger (http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/secdef_histories/bios/weinberger.htm ; http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html) David Wurmser (http://www.aei.org/scholars/wurmser.htm ; http://www.meforum.org.cnchost.com/meq/june99/overthrow.htm ; http://www.aei.org/shop1/shops/1/4074-8.pdf) Please note that Peretz, McFarlane and Wolfowitz are on the Board of Advisors to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) (4), a "think-tank" strongly tied (5) to the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) (6). WINEP's research director is Patrick Clawson (7), a long-time sanctions proponent (8). 1. http://www.sais-jhu.edu/faculty/profiles/wolfowitz.html 2. The Associated Press, "Wolfowitz Named No. 2 at Pentagon," 5 February 2001 3. "The organization, primarily Democrats, is headed by Rep. Stephen J. Solarz (D-N.Y.) and made up largely of longtime political supporters of Israel." (David Lauter, "White House Lobbies for Force Option," The Los Angeles Times, 11 December 1990). 4. http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/staff/ 5. "The advocates of a war policy also have been bolstered by analysts from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank with close ties to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the capital's leading pro-Israel lobbying organization. Washington Institute experts on the region are frequently quoted in television, radio and newspaper stories about the gulf standoff, although their organization's pro-Israel orientation is seldom cited." (David Lauter, "War Lobby' Urges Military Solution," The Los Angeles Times, 14 September 1990). See also http://www.fair.org/extra/0011/winep.html and http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0791/9107030.htm 6. http://www.aipac.org/ For 9 May 2000 AIPAC Letter (calling for sanctions maintenance) to President Clinton, see http://www.aipac.org/result.cfm?id=27 7. http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/senior/clawson.htm 8. See http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/2000-02/27/147l-022700-idx.html and http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/jan-june00/iraq_5-3.html *************************************************** http://www.security-policy.org/papers/1998/98-D33at.html Publications of the Center for Security Policy No. 98-D 33 (Attachment) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 February 1998 Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf 1615 L Street, N.W. Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 202 778 1488 Phone 202 466 6022 Fax Open Letter to the President 19 February 1998 Dear Mr. President, Many of us were involved in organizing the Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf in 1990 to support President Bush's policy of expelling Saddam Hussein from Kuwait. Seven years later, Saddam Hussein is still in power in Baghdad. And despite his defeat in the Gulf War, continuing sanctions, and the determined effort of UN inspectors to fetter out and destroy his weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein has been able to develop biological and chemical munitions. To underscore the threat posed by these deadly devices, the Secretaries of State and Defense have said that these weapons could be used against our own people. And you have said that this issue is about "the challenges of the 21st Century." Iraq's position is unacceptable. While Iraq is not unique in possessing these weapons, it is the only country which has used them -- not just against its enemies, but its own people as well. We must assume that Saddam is prepared to use them again. This poses a danger to our friends, our allies, and to our nation. It is clear that this danger cannot be eliminated as long as our objective is simply "containment," and the means of achieving it are limited to sanctions and exhortations. As the crisis of recent weeks has demonstrated, these static policies are bound to erode, opening the way to Saddam's eventual return to a position of power and influence in the region. Only a determined program to change the regime in Baghdad will bring the Iraqi crisis to a satisfactory conclusion. For years, the United States has tried to remove Saddam by encouraging coups and internal conspiracies. These attempts have all failed. Saddam is more wily, brutal and conspiratorial than any likely conspiracy the United States might mobilize against him. Saddam must be overpowered; he will not be brought down by a coup d'etat. But Saddam has an Achilles' heel: lacking popular support, he rules by terror. The same brutality which makes it unlikely that any coups or conspiracies can succeed, makes him hated by his own people and the rank and file of his military. Iraq today is ripe for a broad-based insurrection. We must exploit this opportunity. Saddam's long record of treaty violations, deception, and violence shows that diplomacy and arms control will not constrain him. In the absence of a broader strategy, even extensive air strikes would be ineffective in dealing with Saddam and eliminating the threat his regime poses. We believe that the problem is not only the specifics of Saddam's actions, but the continued existence of the regime itself. What is needed now is a comprehensive political and military strategy for bringing down Saddam and his regime. It will not be easy -- and the course of action we favor is not without its problems and perils. But we believe the vital national interests of our country require the United States to: Recognize a provisional government of Iraq based on the principles and leaders of the Iraqi National Congress (INC) that is representative of all the peoples of Iraq. Restore and enhance the safe haven in northern Iraq to allow the provisional government to extend its authority there and establish a zone in southern Iraq from which Saddam's ground forces would also be excluded. Lift sanctions in liberated areas. Sanctions are instruments of war against Saddam's regime, but they should be quickly lifted on those who have freed themselves from it. Also, the oil resources and products of the liberated areas should help fund the provisional government's insurrection and humanitarian relief for the people of liberated Iraq. Release frozen Iraqi assets -- which amount to $1.6 billion in the United States and Britain alone -- to the control of the provisional government to fund its insurrection. This could be done gradually and so long as the provisional government continues to promote a democratic Iraq. Facilitate broadcasts from U.S. transmitters immediately and establish a Radio Free Iraq. Help expand liberated areas of Iraq by assisting the provisional government's offensive against Saddam Hussein's regime logistically and through other means. Remove any vestiges of Saddam's claim to "legitimacy" by, among other things, bringing a war crimes indictment against the dictator and his lieutenants and challenging Saddam's credentials to fill the Iraqi seat at the United Nations. Launch a systematic air campaign against the pillars of his power -- the Republican Guard divisions which prop him up and the military infrastructure that sustains him. Position U.S. ground force equipment in the region so that, as a last resort, we have the capacity to protect and assist the anti-Saddam forces in the northern and southern parts of Iraq. Once you make it unambiguously clear that we are serious about eliminating the threat posed by Saddam, and are not just engaged in tactical bombing attacks unrelated to a larger strategy designed to topple the regime, we believe that such countries as Kuwait, Turkey and Saudi Arabia, whose cooperation would be important for the implementation of this strategy, will give us the political and logistical support to succeed. In the present climate in Washington, some may misunderstand and misinterpret strong American action against Iraq as having ulterior political motives. We believe, on the contrary, that strong American action against Saddam is overwhelmingly in the national interest, that it must be supported, and that it must succeed. Saddam must not become the beneficiary of an American domestic political controversy. We are confident that were you to launch an initiative along these line, the Congress and the country would see it as a timely and justifiable response to Iraq's continued intransigence. We urge you to provide the leadership necessary to save ourselves and the world from the scourge of Saddam and the weapons of mass destruction that he refuses to relinquish. Sincerely, Hon. Stephen Solarz Former Member, Foreign Affairs Committee, U.S. House of Representatives Hon. Richard Perle Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute; Former Assistant Secretary of Defense Hon. Elliot Abrams President, Ethics & Public Policy Center; Former Assistant Secretary of State Richard V. Allen Former National Security Advisor Hon. Richard Armitage President, Armitage Associates, L.C.; Former Assistant Secretary of Defense Jeffrey T. Bergner President, Bergner, Bockorny, Clough & Brain; Former Staff Director, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hon. John Bolton Senior Vice President, American Enterprise Institute; Former Assistant Secretary of State Stephen Bryen Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Hon. Richard Burt Chairman, IEP Advisors, Inc.; Former U.S. Ambassador to Germany; Former Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Hon. Frank Carlucci Former Secretary of Defense Hon. Judge William Clark Former National Security Advisor Paula J. Dobriansky Vice President, Director of Washington Office, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Member, National Security Council Doug Feith Managing Attorney, Feith & Zell P.C.; Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy Frank Gaffney Director, Center for Security Policy; Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Forces Jeffrey Gedmin Executive Director, New Atlantic Initiative; Research Fellow, American Enterprise Institute Hon. Fred C. Ikle Former Undersecretary of Defense Robert Kagan Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Zalmay M. Khalilzad Director, Strategy and Doctrine, RAND Corporation Sven F. Kraemer Former Director of Arms Control, National Security Council William Kristol Editor, The Weekly Standard Michael Ledeen Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute; Former Special Advisor to the Secretary of State Bernard Lewis Professor Emeritus of Middle Eastern and Ottoman Studies, Princeton University R. Admiral Frederick L. Lewis U.S. Navy, Retired Maj. Gen. Jarvis Lynch U.S. Marine Corps, Retired Hon. Robert C. McFarlane Former National Security Advisor Joshua Muravchik Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute Robert A. Pastor Former Special Assistant to President Carter for Inter-American Affairs Martin Peretz Editor-in-Chief, The New Republic Roger Robinson Former Senior Director of International Economic Affairs, National Security Council Peter Rodman Director of National Security Programs, Nixon Center for Peace and Freedom; Former Director, Policy Planning Staff, U.S. Department of State Hon. Peter Rosenblatt Former Ambassador to the Trust Territories of the Pacific Hon. Donald Rumsfeld Former Secretary of Defense Gary Schmitt Executive Director, Project for the New American Century; Former Executive Director, President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board Max Singer President, The Potomac Organization; Former President, The Hudson Institute Hon. Helmut Sonnenfeldt Guest Scholar, The Brookings Institution; Former Counsellor, U.S. Department of State Hon. Caspar Weinberger Former Secretary of Defense Leon Wienseltier Literary Editor, The New Republic Hon. Paul Wolfowitz Dean, Johns Hopkins SAIS; Former Undersecretary of Defense David Wurmser Director, Middle East Program, AEI; Research Fellow, American Enterprise Institute Dov S. Zakheim Former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense Organization affiliations given for identification purposes only. Views reflected in the letter are endorsed by the individual, not the institution. ----------------------------------------------- FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email email@example.com Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website: http://www.casi.org.uk