The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
On 27 April 2000, in my capacity as a research associate for the Boston Research Group, I interviewed Scott Ritter for an hour and a half and later transcribed the interview. Ritter’s trip to Iraq provides a good impetus to release the transcript (a very useful document that addresses, e.g., Iraq’s chemical weapons use and non-use; the actual quality of Iraq’s non-conventional weapons; Iraq’s 1988-1991 non-conventional weapons strategy; “de-linking,” what UNSCOM was actually looking for during its late-1998 high-profile inspections; and major regional strategic and non-conventional issues) but before I do so I want to screen it for typographical errors. I have repeatedly proofread the transcript but still want at least one other person to rigorously check the document before I disseminate it. Is any list subscriber willing and able to proofread this already proofread transcript? With much thanks, Nathaniel Hurd Boston, USA ----------------------------------------------- FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website: http://welcome.to/casi