The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
David Ignatius is one of the pillars of the Washington press establishment. He currently serves as financial columnist for the Washington Post, where he was formerly the foreign affairs editor. In September, Ignatius will become the Executive Editor of the International Herald Tribune <http://www.iht.com/IHT/CORP/PRESS/020400.html>. Ignatius is also a novelist, specializing in tales of espionage and intrigue ... In 1994, he wrote "Bank of Fear" (the title itself a nod to Samir al-Khalil's "Republic of Fear") whose heroine is a sympathetically drawn Iraqi-expatriate. The back cover of this mystery features blurbs from not one, not two, but three former Directors of the CIA (Robert Graves, Richard Helms, and William Colby) - plus writer Seymour Hersh. The Directors' accolades are especially stunning in view of the plot, which presents America's foreign policy as directed by a secret group whose chief concern is access to oil ... and which reveals Saddam Hussein as having been recruited by the CIA. ((Don't recall ever hearing of agreement among three former Directors of the CIA ... <g>)) More to the point, in today's Washington Post, David Ignatius writes about the all-too-murky confluence of politics and big oil, which give every appearance of being "inextricably bound". Personally, I've always believed "it's all about oil" to be a gross simplification. But I find these writings intriguing, nonetheless. Regards, Drew Hamre Golden Valley, MN USA === http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1493-2000Jul29.html Political Oil Slick By David Ignatius Sunday, July 30, 2000; Page B07 Politics is ultimately about personal relationships--the handshakes and winks that provide a semblance of trust among often untrustworthy people. The oil business is that way too, and maybe that's why the two have become inextricably bound together. We're now facing the bizarre prospect of a presidential campaign in which three of the four candidates have intimate personal links to the oil industry. George W. Bush made his start running a flaky little oil-exploration company; Richard Cheney, the GOP vice presidential candidate, has for the past five years been CEO of Halliburton Inc., a huge oil-services company that thrived on Cheney's global contacts; and Al Gore's biggest asset is a family trust that holds hundreds of thousands of dollars of stock in Occidental Petroleum Corp., where his father worked for many years. The Democrats hope to make the Bush-Cheney oil connection a winning campaign issue, and there's certainly some tantalizing material to work with. But Gore's Oxy connection raises some uncomfortable questions, too. What's clear, looking at the three candidate's relationships with the industry, is that oil is a kind of original sin in American politics. It's a big, messy (sometimes dirty) business, and it has touched everyone and everything in our political system, from the days of the Rockefellers to Bush and Gore. The industry has become so intertwined with U.S. foreign policy over the years that sometimes--as in Operation Desert Storm (which Cheney oversaw as defense secretary) or the recent scramble to secure Caspian Sea oil (which has been a Gore project)--it's impossible to tell the difference. Bush's oil connection is the most quixotic, because he was such a failure at the business. He started his first company, Arbusto Energy Inc., in 1977, and got friends to invest in various drilling ventures that mostly went nowhere. (Thanks to tax loopholes, it generated more than twice as much in tax deductions as in profits.) Friendly investors arranged a 1984 deal in which Arbusto was acquired by another drilling company called Spectrum 7; it, in turn, was bought in 1986 by Harken Oil and Gas, which seemed to recognize that Spectrum's biggest asset was the Bush name. Cheney's oil resume is more distinguished, and it illustrates how oil and politics can be nearly inseparable. Despite his lack of experience in the industry, he was named Halliburton's CEO in 1995, three years after leaving the Pentagon. Cheney's real drawing card was the network of contacts he had developed during the Persian Gulf War. Grateful Saudis and Kuwaitis were eager to fete Cheney--and to shower his company with contracts. Cheney, like most oilmen, has been unhappy when human rights or other foreign policy issues intrude on the pragmatic needs of the industry. And he has opposed U.S. sanctions that prevented oil companies from doing business with Iraq, Iran and Libya. According to Petroleum Finance Week, he told a 1996 energy conference in New Orleans: "The problem is that the good Lord didn't see fit to put oil and gas reserves where there are democratic governments." Cheney's raw pragmatism also extends to Russia, where Halliburton recently was involved in a controversial deal with an oil company called Tyumen Oil. Halliburton sought a $292 million loan guarantee from the U.S. Export-Import Bank to help refurbish an oil field for Tyumen. The Clinton-Gore administration, stung by charges that it had been soft on Russian business "oligarchs," waged a pressure campaign to persuade Ex-Im to drop the Tyumen loan. The Cheney nomination may thus undermine the Bush campaign's plans to attack Gore as soft on Russian corruption. Hard to be indignant when it turns out that Cheney was lobbying hard to help Russians the Gore crowd regarded as corrupt. Gore's oil connection is hereditary, and it may seem unfair to tar him with the sins of his father. But if he attacks Bush the elder, then the Oxy link will be fair game. A devastating account of the elder Albert Gore relationship with the late chairman of Occidental, Armand Hammer, is contained in Edward Jay Epstein's 1996 book, "Dossier." He decribes how Hammer first made Gore a partner in a cattle-breeding business back in 1950, when Gore was a congressman, providing him with "a substantial profit." The FBI was wary of going after Hammer's connections with the Soviet Union, Epstein notes, because he had influential "political support," including from Gore. Two years after Gore's father left the Senate in 1970, Hammer made him chairman of a coal company Occidental owned, Island Creek Coal. Young Al Gore knew that Hammer was a family friend and benefactor. He invited Hammer as his guest to the 1981 inauguration of Ronald Reagan, according to Epstein. And according to a new biography by Bill Turque, Gore took in more than $300,000 through the early 1990s--his largest source of income outside his congressional salary--from a land deal his father had made with Hammer in 1973. Oil and politics mix all too well, as these three case studies show. Oil isn't a bogeyman, to be sure; it's a legitimate business. But it shouldn't have a secret key to the White House. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email firstname.lastname@example.org Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website: http://welcome.to/casi