The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
A follow-up to Glen's 12 July post: An important question for Mr. Hain is "To whom specifically is Iraq a conventional or non-conventional [chemical, biological, nuclear weapons, and ballistic missiles (missiles with a range great than 150 km) threat?" Possible Candidates (from a military standpoint): Iran- Iran has had a fully operational chemical weapons [CW] program since the early 1980s and large conventional military that is far more organized than the one that defeated Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war until Iraq began to employ CWs and utilize U.S. satellite information to monitor Iranian troop movements and coordinate bombing. Iran is an unlikely choice. Syria- Syria has had a long-standing fully operational CW (that includes VX nerve gas) and biological weapons (BW) program and has a very large standing army, albeit one with outdated equipment. Syria also possesses long range surface-to-surface missiles. Syria is an unlikely choice. Israel- Israel has far and away the most sophisticated non-conventional capability and arsenal in the Middle East. If Iraq uses on Israel CWs or BWs, or ballistic missiles with deadly effects, Israel will almost certainly respond with chemical and/or biological and/or nuclear weapons. Israel is an unlikely choice. Jordan- Iraq and Jordan have close, long-standing diplomatic, military (including alleged monitoring of Israeli military preparations), and perhaps most importantly, economic ties, ties that remain despite Jordan's "no-fly-zone" cooperation and increasingly tight diplomatic relations with the U.S. Jordan is an unlikely candidate. Turkey- Turkey's conventional military is far superior to Iraq's and Turkey is a prime trading partner of Iraq's. Furthermore, Turkey is a key strategic ally of the U.S. Turkey is an unlikely candidate. Kuwait/Saudi Arabia- Judging by the response to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, it is almost implausible that the U.S., given its long-standing stated regional/petroleum interests, would not respond militarily and overwhelmingly if Iraq conventionally or non-conventionally attacked Kuwait and/or Saudi Arabia. Both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia are unlikely candidates. For a conversation with Mr. Hain, it does not matter whether or not one agrees with developing and producing non-conventional weapons, using military force, or U.S. policy/activity in the Middle East. The current regional military dynamic and U.S. petroleum interests exist and will probably exist for quite some time to come. Given that reality, it is important to find out exactly which country Mr. Hain concludes Iraq will potentially be an actual military threat to. It appears as though the proper answer is none. The most likely targets for Iraq's future conventional and non-conventional force are not outside Iraq's borders. They are within. And given the post-1991 and post-"no-fly-zone" village razing and mass execution, it seems unlikely that the UK, U.S., or anyone else for that matter, will take substantive measures to prevent the Iraqi government from killing Iraqi civilians and/or destroying their homes. With regards, Nathaniel Hurd Boston, USA ----------------------------------------------- FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email email@example.com Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website: http://welcome.to/casi