The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company The New York Times July 6, 2000, Thursday, Late Edition - Final SECTION: Section A; Page 2; Column 3; Metropolitan Desk LENGTH: 71 words HEADLINE: Corrections BODY: An article on Monday about the view of a former United Nations weapons inspector, Scott Ritter, that Iraq no longer possesses prohibited weapons of any importance misquoted a passage in an article he had written for the journal Arms Control Today. He wrote that "it was possible as early as 1997 to determine that, from a qualitative standpoint, Iraq had been disarmed." He did not write "from a quantitative standpoint." http://www.nytimes.com LANGUAGE: ENGLISH LOAD-DATE: July 6, 2000 ----------------------------------------------- FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website: http://welcome.to/casi