The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Hi Nathan, Jeff, Valerie, Milan and all, Two quick points: 1) As regards Nathan's comment -- the freedom to make offensive speech -- I'm all for it. 2) That said, I certainly hadn't intended my post itself to be offensive by way of including - errr - an Oedipal vulgarity from the film. My apolgies. As regards Nathan's 'backfire' comment, the ADC's call for letters to Paramount seems risk-free, and those who object to the film would be remiss if they didn't make their points known. I'd agree with Nathan that picketing cinemas seems riskier, and probably less productive. By the way, ADC's intent is instructive - not coercive. They're posting a flyer for distribution, akin to the "Three Kings" leafletting. The ADC has listed a number of reviews where the movie's anti-Arab bias is front-and-center. The sharpest criticism comes from the New York Press: "...the continuing scandal of Hollywood's Arab-bashing smells to high heaven, but this film manages to stun nonetheless." (See <http://www.nypress.com/content.cfm?content_id=1711>; see the others at <http://www.adc.org/action/2000/12bapril2000.htm>). Jeff (and in response, Valerie and Milan) -- as regards Jeff's point (welcoming 'kids with a political conscience'), many reviewers (even those not catching the film's bias) remarked that the protesters actions were *completely* unmotivated. The Yemeni demonstration is given no context. As Paul Clinton (CNN) said, "... it's blatantly racist, using Arabs as cartoon-cutout bad guys ... Why is the embassy in danger? What has happened? Who are the people rioting? We never know ..." Hence the ADC's comment that the film reinforces the Arab as the "quintessential 'other' in contemporary American culture ... as the inherent, irrational and implacable terrorist ..." The film uses xenophobia to propel its plot, and taps the audience's prejudice to amplify its emotional kick. Cheap, tawdry work. If the Shaheen survey seemed 'silly' it's only because my explanation didn't do it justice. Some further info: it's at least 10-years old (pre-dating the Gulf War) and the full question was (roughly): "Can you recall a heroic or humane portrayal of Arabs in literature or the media". Shaheen's intent was not remedial, but rather to highlight the depths of American ignorance of Arab peoples. To remove any whiff of sanctimony in my use of the annecdote, I should have added that when I first heard the question (a year ago) I, too, could not have answered. Bad as it is, the movie is an opportunity. For every newspaper whose reviewer was blind to the film's biases, there's a Letter to the Editor waiting to be written that links this omission to the lack of coverage of the sanctions in Iraq. I'll close mine with Halliday's recent comment, "Iraqi kids don't count apparently. It is a racist problem, there really is no question about that. It's ugly." <http://www.zmag.org/edwinthalliday.htm> Regards, Drew Hamre Golden Valley, MN USA -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email email@example.com Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website: http://welcome.to/casi