The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
>At the risk of being called an evil imperialist, I would suggest >that it >is a gross oversimplification to call every act of >interference in the >sovereignty of another country "colonial" guiding of poor "uncivilised" >non-westerners. The image of a world made of >cosy, defined, "sovereign" >states is illusory. President Wilson had a >vision of such a world for the >former Yugoslavia after world war one; >the ethnic conflict over the past >century are a testament to how that >vision failed. A side point I know but it's important not to let things slip. The former Yugoslavia was a relative sea of calm in terms of ethnic conflict after world war one, save for the Croatian Ustasha set up by Nazi Germany. The resistance to the Ustasha was led by Tito's partisans who were comprised of all ethnic groups. In Bosnia, the most "ethnically mixed" area of FY there were 30-40% intermarriage between the "ethnic" groups. One third of the territorial defence force of Sarajevo in 1993 (well into the Bosnian conflict) was comprised of Serbs. My point is: we shouldn’t characterise FY as an area of rampant ethnic conflict. IMO this is a gross oversimplification. Doug. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk Full archive and list instructions are available from the CASI website: http://welcome.to/casi