The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sanctions and two sets of hostages



>With apologies for a repeated section of text, I promise not to
>post it to CASI after this issue - someone somehow has not seen
>the point being made by our own British Foreign Office ????????
> 
>Eric Herring wrote: 
>
>"  This implies logically that the sanctions could 
>be lifted even with no cooperation regarding the missing 
>605. Having said that, paragraph 21 introduces an ambiquity 
>indicating a possible link of lifting/relaxing sanctions to 
>cooperation with all relevant UN resolutions.
>In the end it comes done to a matter of interpretation.  "
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moonirah - H.E.L.P. CO-ORDINATOR IN THE UK responding wrote:20/9/99
>
>
>Our e-mail address could not possibly include:
>HELP-lebanese-egyptian-omani-bahraini-saudi-indian-phillipino-kuwaiti.hostages-pows-in
>Iraq !!  As the 605 were illegally abducted to Iraq from 'Kuwait' 1990 - 1991 and their
>families established a Committee in 'Kuwait' 1991, then in Cardiff during 1997, we
>thought of Hostages' Envoys for Liberty of Prisoners in Iraq = H.E.L.P. and arranged an
>e-mail address:help-kuwaiti.hostages-pows-iniraq@dtn.ntl.com.
 
>One of our own British phrases I recall is " cannot see the wood for the trees " ?
>This matter is not a new development but commenced with the 1991 Cease-fire Agreement
>and UN Resolution 687 (1991.  Then again last year (1998) UN Resolution 1154.
>Our organisation finally obtained TV, Radio and Press coverage for this humanitarian
>issue 1998 - 1999 locally in Wales, UK national, Arab News and British Forces Radio !
>
>I went to Kuwait on a campaign visit February this year, interviewed hostages'
>families and spoke to the sad children who dearly want their 'daddy' or 'mummy' to come
>home please. How those people suffered at the hands of some Iraqis whilst illegally >occupying 
>that Emirate !!  I saw evidential documentation, testimonials plus colour >photographs of children 
>and adults proving all the atrocities which I had heard about
>from a variety of sources before going and I felt that I should see the evidence for
>myself in order to speak of related matters, on travels, for our freedom campaign.
>
>The rapes of women and men, tortures with sulphuric acid and various instruments were.
>atrocities carried out on the Kuwaiti nation, which I hoped would not be repeated on
>any other human being - it was absolutely horrific.
>
>I met Kuwaiti Red Crescent personnel, medics and volunteers who since 1991 contribute
>lots of humanitarian aid to the innocents in Iraq. Kuwaitis work hard helping Iraqis
>and I had not known this fact until I went abroad looking for some truth myself.
>
>I and many people connected with our organisation are British - no foreign origins,
>whilst other supportive and valued individuals come from a variety of countries.
>A Canadian and an American offered to HELP us when I met both ladies, 'out of the blue'
>exploring a DHOW in Kuwait's Museum that was re-built since Iraqis burned it down.
>It was they who approached me, with a Welsh lilt in my voice speaking fluent English
>but dressed appropriately for any Muslim country, fully covered they were very kind.
>
>Relatives of the 605 reside in Wales, England and Scotland.
>
>With consideration to the Moderator and CASI participants, I should not repeat myself ?
>
>With the greatest of respect EH to your viewpoint, as the 605 are loved relatives, >cherished 
>colleagues and treasured friends, all of whom have been dearly missed for >nine years - we cannnot 
>possibly just go on " interpretation "  In a written letter >dated 19th March 1998 signed from 
>Foreign Secretary Robin Cook to Shadow Foreign >Secretary Michael Howard, referring to my own 
>'607' enquiries, Mr Cook wrote that he
>shares my concern and was particularly struck by the plight of the families when he
>visited Kuwait during the previous month (February 1998) also he clearly confirmed,
>" sanctions cannot be lifted until this issue is resolved ".
>
>Before, during and after the recent new Draft Resolution Proposal by Britain it was >again 
>verbally confirmed to me by telephone when speaking to the Middle East Department >of F.C.O. in 
>London.  One call in particular I remember well - after the sudden death
>of Derek Fatchett I was speaking by telephone to Jane Bailey who that day re-confirmed >"sanctions 
>cannot be lifted until this issue is resolved" plus, we spoke of the media >and press focussing on 
>non-compliance of weapons inspections, thus knowingly omitting
>facts about the human face of this tragedy, which is a key piece in all this - despite
>so many people not seeing it clearly yet !  Time perhaps will help them comprehend ??
>
>When I asked her whether their decisions or policies had been or were to being changed,
>Ms Bailey added, re-assuringly, that the request for release of the 605 detainees is >always 
>discussed at every meeting attended by F.C.O. representatives with the United >Nations, etc etc. 
>It was agreed by us both that the 605 Kuwaiti plus THIRD-NATIONAL >hostages and PoWs' humanitarian 
>issue is constantly excluded by news agencies, although >all media and press are totally aware 
>that UN Resolution 1154 signed 1998 and 687 >signed 1991 requires IRAQ to release the 605 
>detainees.  Hence you have the statements >again put out in current news reports confirming " 
>pressure on Iraq to meet its
>international obligations ", i.e. Resolutions 1154 and 687 !!
>
> Re:London meeting this week between 5 main members of UN ..
> UN Permanent Members Make Progress on Iraq Sanctions:UK
>
> "Progress was made but eventual success is not certain,"
> a Reuters report quoted the spokesman as saying.
> "There is no guarantee this will be achieved, but we must
> explore the possibilities to create a united Security Council
> position to put pressure on Iraq to meet its international obligations,
>
> and responding, Moonirah wrote:
>
>United Security Council position to put pressure on Iraq to meet its
>international obligations,........
>
>"international obligations" = release 605 hostages & PoWs - Third-nationals plus
> Kuwaitis, illegally abducted '90 - '91 to Iraq and confirmed 1998 on UK Channel 4
> TV as seen there inside Iraqi prisons by British Baroness Emma Nicholson - politician.
> 
> Arab press recently stated that Kuwait is not opposing changes to sanctions ?
> Although Iraq killed two Kuwaiti Border Patrollers this week.
> 
> The British Foreign Office, Middle East Department correspondence confirms:
> "sanctions cannot be lifted until this issue is resolved" - according to
> United Nations Resolutions 1154 signed 1998 and 687 signed 1991 with Cease-fire.
> 
> Across the globe, humanitarian campaigners and political activists do not
> have the full information for their debates, discussions, news groups, forums,
> petitions, rallies and demonstrations - unless these true facts are included
> throughout considerations.
> 
> I am not asking for sanctions against any country but I am quoting this
> statement of our, own F.C.O. in London which also confirmed the same by
> telephone to me:
>
> "sanctions cannot be lifted until this issue is resolved" - despite
> ongoing speculation, plus some media and press now knowingly excluding
> these facts also.  However, it gets them nowhere, the sanctions stand
> it seems until 605 detainees are released by Iraq and they return
> 'archives' which they stole from Kuwait.  At every meeting regarding
> "sanctions" between UN members and our own British Government
> representatives the humanitarian issue of 605 hostages plus PoWs held
> in Iraq belonging to several countries is discussed.
>
> Nobody can ignore this matter, otherwise no progress can be made -
> evidentially, the past nine years have proven this is true.
>
> Unless you consider the foregoing you miss the point..with respect - miss it again ?
> 
> Moonirah
> UK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two points:
> 
> Much as I sympathise with the plight of those held by Iraq,
> there is something very sick about holding the entire Iraqi
> population hostage and contributing to the death of close to
> a million of them (people who have very little ability to do
> anything to change IRaqi policy), supposedly as part of a
> campaign to release about 600 people.
> 
> And as far as the British position is concerned that the
> sacntions should nto be lifted until Iraq cooperates on
> this matter, paragraph 22 links the lifting or relaxing of
> sanctions only to nuclear, biological and chemical weapon
> and long-range ballsitic missile disarmament and
> monitoring. This implies logically that the sanctions could
> be lifted even with no cooperation regarding the missing
> 605. Having said that, paragraph 21 introduces an ambiquity
> indicating a possible link of lifting/relaxing sanctions to
> cooperation with all relevant UN resolutions.
> In the end it comes done to a matter of interpretation.             ???????????
> ----------------------
> Dr. Eric Herring
> Department of Politics
> University of Bristol
> 10 Priory Road
> Bristol BS8 1TU
> England, UK
> Tel. +44-(0)117-928-8582
> Fax +44-(0)117-973-2133
> http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Politics
> eric.herring@bristol.ac.uk
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
> To be removed/added, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk, NOT
> the whole list. Please do not sent emails with attached files to the list
> *** Archived at http://linux.clare.cam.ac.uk/~saw27/casi/discuss.html ***


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To be removed/added, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk, NOT
the whole list. Please do not sent emails with attached files to the list
*** Archived at http://linux.clare.cam.ac.uk/~saw27/casi/discuss.html ***


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]