The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Please write to the Independent (again)



Please send letters to letters@independent.co.uk.

>From today's (28th June) letters to The Independent :

Sir: Peter McKenna's depiction of US and UK policy on sanctions against Iraq
(letter, 26 June) won't withstand a moment's scrutiny.
The Clinton administration has been at pains to soften the sanctions regime,
despite Saddam Hussein's failure to comply with UN requirements regarding
inspection of weapons facilities.

In October 1997 the US retreated from even a minor symbolic sanction -
restricting travel for officials obstructing inspections - and agreed that
Iraq should be allowed to sell oil to earn hard currency for food and
medicine.

Oliver Kamm, London WC1




--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To be removed/added, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk, NOT
the whole list. Please do not sent emails with attached files to the list
*** Archived at http://linux.clare.cam.ac.uk/~saw27/casi/discuss.html ***


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]