The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
I contacted a friend in the US Air Force (with air combat experience in the Gulf) on radars and threats to address Andrew Loucks' question of whether aircraft are always illuminated by radar. Here is his response: Civilian radar's indeed "illuminate" aircraft all the time. They do this for air traffic control purposes. However, they are NOT threatening to our aircraft because they are using what we call "Search Radar." Civilian search radar is relatively low power and can NOT be used to help guide a missile. Search radar does what the name implies: It tracks an aircraft in a non-threatening way at a relatively low power, on specific radar band-widths. This radar is used to just get radar returns to follow an aircraft for air traffic control purposes. It is best used with Transponders on an aircraft. Transponders reply electronically to the search radar in order to enhance the radar return and to pass information (altitude, airspeed, call-sign, heading, stuff like that). Nonetheless, we can also use this type of radar to find aircraft in a combat environment. [Please note-under current Rules of Engagement, getting painted by "search" radar, civilian or military, is not sufficient justification to shoot.] You know, it is not a very efficient or smart to use civilian search radar's in a combat environment because civilian search radar's are best used in conjunction with transponders and in combat we TURN OFF our transponder. We become VERY difficult to find and, moreover, this radar information is NOT data-linked to missile batteries. Now, it is very easy to distinguish the radar band-width used for civilian search radar's and the band-width associated with Surface to Air Missile (SAM) radar. You see, we have systems on combat aircraft that can easily determine if the civilian or military radar "painting" you is civilian or military "search" or Target Tracking Radar (TTR). This system on the aircraft is called "Radar Warning Receivers-RAWR" TTR radar emissions cause all sorts of audio and visual cues that tell the pilot that someone is either gonna shoot at you or already has!! (Remember the rapid-beeping tones in the videos I played--TTR warnings!) By switching to TTR you upgrade the band-width and power-level. By doing this you are electronically signaling to the world that you are, in essence, drawing, aiming and cocking a gun and starting to pull the trigger. Now, what was happening in Iraq was the bad guys were using a SAM radar system not only in "search" mode, but switched to the more powerful and threatening TTR. They switched to TTR in to better illuminate the aircraft, to refine the firing solution and to make the aircraft "brighter" so the missile can follow the radar reflection to the aircraft. When you are flying and you get "hits" from a SAM search radar it raises the hair on the back of your neck-it means the bad guys are looking at you. It is not, under current guidance and in reality, all that threatening. However, once the bad guys switch to TTR, that action is very, very obvious and unmistakable and clearly means they are about to shoot at you or already pulled the trigger! TTR's are without question, VERY THREATENING. You see, you do not switch to TTR unless you are going to fire. The reason is simple. You go to TTR and YOU become the target and you better make sure the time you are emitting TTR is very short because if you don't, you will have a HARM missile knocking on your door shortly. This situation can best be compared to the old west quick-draw: he who can shoot first and score a hit, wins. Hope this helps. Andrew Loucks wrote > I'm no expert, but aren't civilian aircraft constantly > "illuminated" by radar? Wouldn't a developed country > "illuminate" every airborn object that enters its > airspace? I'm sure that the "first step" to firing on > someone is to locate that someone using radar, but it's > also the first step to a lot of things. It's the only > step taken if the goal is to simply monitor one's > airspace. ---------------------- Dr. Eric Herring Department of Politics University of Bristol 10 Priory Road Bristol BS8 1TU England, UK Tel. +44-(0)117-928-8582 Fax +44-(0)117-973-2133 http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Politics email@example.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To be removed/added, email firstname.lastname@example.org, NOT the whole list. Archived at http://linux.clare.cam.ac.uk/~saw27/casi/discuss.html