The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
"It will take years to fathom the harm being done to the lives of 21.7 million people by a policy intended to bring Iraq back into the international community of nations by toppling Saddam Hussein." ******************** 'Iraq is falling apart. We are ruined' Allied bombing raids and sanctions aimed at toppling Saddam Hussein are punishing the ordinary people By David Sharrock in Baghdad The Guardian, Saturday April 24, 1999 Taking a walk in this benighted city is a lesson in modern warfare. What may happen tomorrow in the Balkans was tested first in Iraq. You only need to take a few steps down any Baghdad street to feel the changes - feared by the majority and exploited by the profiteering few - creeping into every facet of life. It is clear that something sinister and irrevocable is under way. Beneath the outward calm, chaos is bubbling. "Everything you see points to Iraq falling apart," says a Baghdad veteran. "This country is becoming a third world nation." Grubby street children sell bubble gum or beg at traffic lights and prostitutes walk the major roads; this in a country which has undergone a religious revival. "Iraq used to be a secular society with an educated population and a growing middle class," says one Baghdad professional. "It is simply impossible to believe what is happening. Tribalism and religion are asserting their old dominance. Urban society has been ruined, people are returning to the countryside to find food. We are utterly ruined." Go and ask the traders on Rashid Street, known as the 'thieves' market', what is going on. Or wait until they ask you - once they believe that the secret police are not listening to their small, brave acts of independence - to explain the 'Anglo-American plan' for their liberation. You can find most things in this souk, from a video player to a corkscrew, everything that would have been commonplace in an average Baghdad household before the Gulf war. Now no item is too small for resale if it brings in a few US dollars. Here I met Karim, a slight figure whose impeccable English betrayed his British university education - civil engineering at Birmingham. He was trying, without conviction, to sell black market cigarettes. "Please, I would like to ask you a question if I may," he said hesitantly. "You are from England? It is a country I love, I made many good friends. I found they were gentle people. I want to know, do they know what is happening to Iraq? Do they know that our leaders are not getting hurt by the embargo, that it is only the ordinary people who you are harming?" Quite simply, the west is conducting a monstrous social experiment on the people of Iraq. A once prosperous nation is being driven into the pre-industrial dark ages. It will take years to fathom the harm being done to the lives of 21.7 million people here by a policy intended, according to its shapers in Washington and supporters in London, to bring Iraq back into the international community of nations by toppling Saddam Hussein. Karim is typical of thousands of members of the Iraqi middle class. He studied in Britain and then returned home to pass on his knowledge. "My professor begged me to stay, he said I reminded him of [his] own son and that I could make a better life in England," he says. "But I was young and idealistic, I wanted to fight to improve my country. I now know it was the worst mistake of my life." Karim married and found a job as a university professor with a salary of around £1,500 a month. That was plenty to raise his four children on before the war, when a quasi-socialist system and vast oil wealth gave Iraqis one of the highest standards of living in the Middle East. As long as the oil flowed and you kept your nose clean, the excesses of President Saddam's regime - the all-enveloping security services and the war with Iran - could be managed with little discomfort. Nobody anticipated that President Saddam would invade Kuwait in August 1990, still less the consequences of his defeat. The west had long been an ally, arming Iraq for its proxy war with the Shi'ite fundamentalist regime in Iran. Even in 1988, when sarin and mustard gas were rained on the Kurds, killing 5,000 in a day at Halabja, western protests were muted. But by challenging the regional order and threatening the status quo of the world's oil market, he was transformed overnight into public enemy number one. United Nations security resolutions demanded that the Iraqi regime destroy its weapons of mass destruction but Washington, with London's support, had bolder plans. Robert Gates, a deputy national security adviser under President George Bush, said that "Iraqis will pay the price" while President Saddam was in power. This presupposed that the Iraqi leader cared for his people. The economic blockade on Iraq was only partially relieved in 1996, when a UN oil-for-food programme was accepted after the World Health Organisation reported that most Iraqis had been on a "semi-starvation diet for years". Within a year of the invasion of Kuwait food prices in Iraq increased by 2,000 per cent. Hyper-inflation turned Karim's comfortable salary into the equivalent of $4 a month and everything was sold, even his wedding ring. The experience has left him deeply suspicious of the US and Britain. "Do they really want to get rid of our friend [the euphemism employed by Iraqis when they talk about their leader] by killing all of us first? Perhaps they are actually helping to keep him in power?" he says. The strict rationing has certainly strengthened President Saddam's control over his people. On the eve of the 1995 referendum which asked "Do you agree that Saddam Hussein should be president of Iraq?" security officers visited the eight million eligible voters and asked two questions: "Do you know how to vote?" and "Are you receiving your food rations?" President Saddam won 99.96% of the vote. Off Saadoun Street is a pharmacy run by Dr Yussuf Kassab, who should have retired after a lifetime's work at the ministry of health. He is forced to work because his sons, one a dentist, the other an engineer, cannot afford to live independently. Many of his clients leave empty-handed, unable to obtain even such ordinary items as antihistamines and cough linctus. The situation has improved slightly over the last six months, but Dr Kassab says: "There is a restricted amount of many of these products in circulation, so the patients will just keep going round the city looking. Maybe they will be lucky." Ominously, a recent UN security council report notes that as of late January, $275 million of supplies and medicine purchased under the oil-for-food programme had accumulated in government warehouses - more than half of the supplies which have arrived in Iraq. Under the programme Iraq is in charge of distribution not the UN. "According to information provided by United Nations observers only 15 per cent of all medical equipment received by the warehouses had been distributed," it says. One officer in the relief field comments: "Two months ago I would have said point blank that I did not believe that the Iraqi government was deliberately starving its people or depriving them of essential medicines, but I'm coming round to the view that, as part of their plan, someone somewhere is not rushing these things through as much as they might." Dennis Halliday, an Irish Quaker who was the UN humanitarian co-ordinator, resigned from his post last summer, bitterly observing that by his estimate, sanctions have killed a million Iraqis, including 500,000 children. But when this statistic was put to the US secretary of state Madeleine Albright in 1996, when she was US ambassador to the UN, she replied: "I think this is a very hard choice but the price - we think the price is worth it." Today, 4,000-5,000 children are dying every month because of the poor water supplies, an inadequate diet and a lack of health care. Malnutrition among children under five, having fallen from 32 per cent since the introduction of the oil-for-food programme, is now stubbornly stuck at 23 per cent. Pierrette Vu Thi, a planning officer for Unicef, has a different spin on one of the US military planners' favourite buzzwords - "degradation". While advocates of the military option talk about "degrading" President Saddam's capacity to threaten his neighbours, Ms Vu Thi says that the real "degradation" is occurring in Iraq's social fabric. Half of the country's schools are not fit for occupation, 10,000 teachers have given up their jobs because they cannot survive on the salary of $3-10 a month and 30 per cent of children have dropped out of school. "The oil-for-food programme has not addressed this degradation," she says. Ms Vu Thi is careful to stop short of Mr Halliday's assessment of the merits of the sanctions campaign, merely stating "Unicef's great concern". Crime is rising as Iraq's infrastructure crumbles. Electricity supplies are running at only 40 per cent of their pre-war levels. Up to $60 billion is needed to restore an adequate supplies of water, electricity, education and health care. Meanwhile, continuing bombing raids in the "no-fly zones" in the north and south of Iraq are the heart of the latest phase in the US-British war on Iraq. A US assertion that around 200 bombs have been dropped in "self-defence" on Iraqi military installations since Operation Desert Fox ended is "far below reality" according to one independent observer. "The Iraqi claim that 3,200 sorties have been flown by the Americans and British since Desert Fox is accurate. It is very nearly the same number as in the whole of the air campaign during the Gulf war. They are fighting a low-intensity, high-technology, undeclared war." Another western source agrees, but doubts whether the Americans and British are any nearer to removing President Saddam from power. "The Americans are gaining much more by chipping away every day at his military infrastructure than with a four-day intensive blitz as in December," he says. "The air strikes are happening on a daily basis but are going virtually unreported I don't know if they have a strategy, it just looks like lashing out." The Iraqi people usually know what's going on, thanks to the Voice of America, the BBC World Service and the bush telegraph. They have just been told that the US is not at war with Iraq but rather, in the surreal phrase of Thomas Pickering, the US undersecretary of state for political affairs, in a "state of animosity" with Baghdad. Intriguingly, Mr Pickering also told a US senate hearing that the UN oil-for-food programme is a linchpin for Washington's efforts to maintain sanctions. And according to the junior foreign office minister Tony Lloyd, the British government "has decided to launch a new policy of better targeted, smarter sanctions" which will ensure that "the people who are hit are the ones who should be hit". "Ah, your Mr Robin Cook," said Karim, catching sight of the foreign secretary on an Iraqi news programme. "He said he was going to give Britain an ethical foreign policy, didn't he? Can you ask him for me, what is there ethical about what he is doing to me or all the other ordinary Iraqis?" At the Saddam Hospital for Children, there is ample opportunity to study the consequences of this ethical foreign policy. Ayat Abbad is a year old yet weighs just over 3kg, half her ideal weight. Like thousands of other babies she is suffering from marasmus, a type of malnutrition which was unheard of in Iraq before the Gulf war and the sanctions, and has suffered gastroenteritis and pneumonia. The duty doctor holds out little hope for her survival. "She will either die before the end of the year or she will live and grow up stunted and with low intelligence," he says. "It is not just the lack of medicines, they have created an entire culture of embargo we are not receiving new-generation drugs, advances in medicine, science, food, anything." Besieged by US and British policy and by a government which treats its people as bargaining chips, the only real casualties of this unending war are those who can least afford to pay the price or raise their voices to be heard. What poses the greater danger to the west's "vital regional interests" in the future? The survival of Saddam Hussein or a generation of Iraqis made bitter by the indifference of western nations which are running daily raids in "self defence"? ******************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To be removed/added, email email@example.com, NOT the whole list. Archived at http://linux.clare.cam.ac.uk/~saw27/casi/discuss.html