The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
The exchanges between
Alan Bates, J. Vernon, and F. Sultana have been valuable in demonstrating the
diversity of views within CASI regarding civil
disobedience.
It seems there are two
major issues involved, both of which require careful discussion. One is the
moral and legal validity of committing criminal damage of the kind carried out
by Gabriel and Andrea - in the circumstances which they faced in December.
Another is the effect on public opinion. Different people will make different
judgements on both these issues (which are I believe linked - the likely effect
of particular acts of civil disobedience on public opinion is a critical element
in their moral value, in my opinion).
I won't enter any major
argument on either issue here. The only points I would like to make are that
circulation of this announcement regarding the trial implies nothing concerning
CASI's stance on civil disobedience, or any other campaigning tactics, and did
not presume (on our part) a consensus of support by all CASI supporters. We in
Voices are perfectly aware that CASI is constitutionally bound to campaign only
on the sanctions issue, and that it cannot take any stance on the bombing of
Iraq.
We are bound together by
our concern for the ordinary people of Iraq, and our determination to force the
government to reverse its stance on sanctions. I hope that our disagreements
over tactics will not damage that fundamental consensus and our willingness to
co-operate for the good of the people of Iraq.
Best
wishes,
Milan Rai
|