The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

October sanctions review may be scrapped !

 U.N. to Mull Iraq Sanction Reviews 
By Nicole Winfield
Associated Press Writer
Monday, August 24, 1998; 5:31 p.m. EDT

UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- The United States and Britain are seeking to have
regular reviews on sanctions against Iraq suspended until Baghdad resumes
cooperation with U.N. weapons inspectors, diplomats said Monday. 

U.S. and British officials said they would begin circulating a draft
resolution this week. Washington is looking to put off the 60-day reviews
until Iraq ``comes back into cooperation'' with inspectors, said U.S.
Deputy Ambassador Peter Burleigh. 

If adopted, the resolution would be the toughest action the 15-member
Security Council has taken since Baghdad announced Aug. 5 that it would
stop cooperating with the United Nations. The move would scrap a major
six-month review of sanctions scheduled for October, when Iraq and its
council supporters were expected to push for the measures to be eased. 

Nevertheless, there were questions about whether a suspension would
improve the chances for a break in the impasse. It was also unclear how
the council could reconcile suspending regular reviews while considering a
proposal for a comprehensive review of sanctions. 

Secretary-General Kofi Annan recommended a comprehensive review after
Baghdad's decision earlier this month. He sent his envoy, Prakash Shah, to
Baghdad to try to persuade the Iraqi leadership to change its mind. 

Shah briefed the council Monday on his meetings with Deputy Prime Minister
Tariz Aziz, which produced no progress. 

``Basically, they felt that since I had come there only with a message to
comply and that I had no proposals to negotiate with them, they had no
reason to change the decision taken August 5th,'' Shah said. 

Iraq said it was interrupting cooperation with the United Nations because
the chief weapons inspector, Richard Butler, refused to certify that
Baghdad had destroyed its banned weapons. 

The sanctions were imposed after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. The council
will lift them only when it is convinced that Iraq no longer has
long-range missiles and chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. 

Iraq claims it has complied with U.N. resolutions and claims Washington is
manipulating Butler and his U.N. Special Commission to maintain sanctions. 

Iraq's main concern is the restructuring of the commission, said Iraq's
ambassador, Nizar Hamdoon. 

``Unless this restructuring takes place, Iraq finds it very difficult,
almost impossible, to keep any meaningful cooperation with UNSCOM,''
Hamdoon said. 

To date, the council has only called Baghdad's action ``totally

Last year, the council suspended sanctions reviews after Baghdad refused
to allow inspectors access to presidential palaces, which Iraq ruled off
limits citing its sovereignty. 

) Copyright 1998 The Associated Press

Back to the top



This is a discussion list run by Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To be removed/added, email, NOT the
whole list. Archived at

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]