The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Answer to Alan Bates

Yes Alan, this time you made a sensible point, not only that it is also a very
difficult point to argue and answer: If Saddam Hussein has chemical Weapons and
he doesnt want to comply with UN resolutions. Let me try to answer your views
in thge same order as you wrote them.
1. You point out thatIraq has got weapons of mass destruction which is a
problem. However, so Does Israel. 
2. You worry about the fact that Iraq's regime is in constant defiance to the
UN resolutions and persecute minorities and violate human rights. I say, so does
Israel, for a longer time and affecting even more people.
 I am not saying this to suggest that if Israel can do it so should Iraq. I  am
trying to say exactly the opposite, If Iraq can't do it so Isreal shouldn't. 
 The arms race is always a phenomenom that comes with increasing instability in
a region. The middle east has been evrything but stable throughout history,
specially since 1948. If the western powers do not allow a balance in the
region countries are going to feel threatened and begin hostile acts, like
adquiring larger weapons. Since 1948 the west has NOT tried to balance the
powers of the middle east, and have simply tried to alienate some, always
favourying Israel. This is an act of hipocrecy and the hostility of Arabs to
the west has been the result.
 Going back to the point of Hussein, yes he does present a threat and he is not
complying with the resolutions of the UN. But from an arab government point of
view he is only not complying with the resolutions of a organization that is
very obviously biased in favour of its enemies. There will be no respect to
this organization as long as it is run by US interests. Was the Un what it says
it is, an organisation of the united nations of the world that want to preserve
the planet, look for peace and stability, based on humanitarian and not
political ideas it would be respected.
 We cannnot go on expecting everyone else to follow the rules if the big boys
don't follow them.
 That I beleive is the way forward, to work for a UN that works on its
principles so it can stop being a  weak institution bullied by western powers.
  In the long run, all countries, will see this organism as a fair system and
should respect it.
 Yes I know I haven't answered your point of what to do instead of bombings or
sanctions to avoid Iraq having weapons of mass destruction. I beleive in a
a) continuation of MILITARY IMPORT sanctions, to prevent any more weapons being
b) a lifting of the other economic sanctions so the population can have
a breathing space and can see their leader for what he is, a secular dictator,
and no longer a heroe who stands up to agression by the west. This will
eventually undermine his power.
c) But more importantly a search for real peace in
the area. In which there is a balance of power, in which the Israelis comply
with what they have to comply so that other countries stop seeing international
organisations as US-led and start seeing them as benevolent institutions that
look for real peace. In this scenario the weapons Iraq, or Israel or Iran may
have will be obsolute, not in terms of the arms race but in terms thatthere wont
be any need to use them or to spend any more in weapons. That is to be achieevd
not in the area of the gulf but at a world level. The US has to be pressured to
follow the UN resolutions, because we are all in this mess together and we are
all to follow the rules of common sense and NOT the rules of the western
 I know that sounds like a very neo-hippie , peace and love, 70's sort of
speech but at the end of the day i am not affraid of speaking up about this
issue, and giving my life to struggle for this, 'cause I beleive is the only way
forward. Lets brake the structure of agressive domination and lets look for
peaceful, non-hipocritical solutions to conflicts.
                                                Kifah Sasa
                                                CASI Middlesex
This is a discussion list run by Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To be removed/added, email, NOT the
whole list. Archived at

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]