The following is an archived copy of a message sent to the CASI Analysis List run by Cambridge Solidarity with Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of Cambridge Solidarity with Iraq (CASI).

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [CASI Homepage]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi-analysis] FT calls for US/UK withdrawal from Iraq

[ This message has been sent to you via the CASI-analysis mailing list ]

Dear friends

As you may know, yesterday the Financial Times called for US/UK withdrawal from Iraq.

Just in case you missed the editorial, it is pasted in below.

Please excuse our cross-posting.

Best wishes

Milan Rai


Taken from

or (to avoid broken link)


'Time to consider Iraq withdrawal'
Financial Times Editorial, 10 September, 2004

This week a macabre milestone was passed in Iraq. More than 1,000 American soldiers have now been 
killed since the US-led invasion of the country began nearly 18 months ago. The overwhelming 
majority lost their lives after President George W. Bush declared major combat operations over in 
his now infamous "Mission Accomplished" photo-opportunity in May last year.

In that time, an unknown number of mostly civilian Iraqis, certainly not less than 10,000 and 
possibly three times that number, have perished, and hundreds more are dying each week. After an 
invasion and occupation that promised them freedom, Iraqis have seen their security evaporate, 
their state smashed and their country fragment into a lawless archipelago ruled by militias, 
bandits and kidnappers.

The transitional political process, designed to lead to constituent assembly and general elections 
next year, has been undermined because the nervous US-dominated occupation authority has insisted 
on hand-picking various permutations of interim Iraqi governors, mostly exiles or expatriates with 
no standing among their people. Whatever Iraqis thought about the Americans on their way in - and 
it was never what these emigré politicians told Washington they would be thinking - an overwhelming 
majority now views US forces as occupiers rather than liberators and wants them out.

The aftermath of a war won so quickly has been so utterly bungled, moreover, that the US is down to 
the last vestiges of its always exiguous allied support, at the time when Iraq needs every bit of 
help it can get. The occupation has lost control of big swathes of the country. Having decided that 
all those who lived and worked in Iraq under Saddam Hussein bore some degree of collective guilt, 
Washington's viceroys purged the country's armed forces, civil service and institutions to a degree 
that broke the back of the state, marginalised internal political forces, sidelined many with the 
skills to rebuild Iraq's services and utilities and, of course, fuelled an insurgency US forces 
have yet to identify accurately, let alone get to grips with.

There are signs that US officials are beginning to "get it" - in the phrase Donald Rumsfeld, US 
defence secretary, patronisingly used this week to characterise Iraqis' grasp of the security 
situation. But if they are increasingly aware that what they have created in Iraq is a disaster, 
they seem at a loss to know what to do about it.

The core question to be addressed is this: is the continuing presence of US military forces in Iraq 
part of the solution or part of the problem?

As occupying power, the US bears responsibility for Iraq under international law, and is duty-bound 
to try to leave it in better shape than it found it. But there is no sign of that happening.

The time has therefore come to consider whether a structured withdrawal of US and remaining allied 
troops, in tandem with a workable handover of security to Iraqi forces and a legitimate and 
inclusive political process, can chart a path out of the current chaos.

Faced with a withdrawal timetable, Iraqis who currently feel helpless will know that the 
opportunity to craft a better future lies in their hands.

Take security. Iraqi forces are being rebuilt to take over front-line tasks. This is slow work, but 
that is not the real problem. It is that those forces already trained cannot stand alongside a US 
military that daily rains thousands of tonnes of projectiles and high explosives on their 
compatriots. Each time there is a siege of Fallujah or Najaf, with the US using firepower that 
kills civilians by the hundred, these Iraqi forces melt away. Until eventual withdrawal, there 
would have to be a policy of military restraint, imposed above all on those US commanders who have 
operated without reference to their own superiors, let alone the notionally sovereign Iraqi 

Politically, if next year's elections are to have any chance of reflecting the will of the Iraqi 
people, the process must be opened up. Last month's national conference or proto-assembly was 
monopolised by expatriate politicians aligned with the interim government of Iyad Allawi. The only 
way national coalitions can be woven from Iraq's religious and ethnic patchwork is by including the 
opposition to the occupation. That means negotiating with the insurgents, probably through 
religious leaders of the stature of Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. It also means an amnesty, which 
should help Iraqi authorities acquire the legitimacy to crush jihadist and other hold-outs.

Ideally, the US would accompany withdrawal by stating it has no intention of establishing bases in 
Iraq, and instead wishes to facilitate regional security agreements. That would be more stabilising 
than the current policy of bullying neighbours such as Iran and Syria, whose borders with Iraq the 
US in any case cannot control.

None of this will be less than messy. But whether Mr Bush or John Kerry wins the upcoming election, 
the US will eventually have to do something like this. Chaos is a great risk, and occupiers through 
the ages have pointed to that risk as their reason for staying put. But chaos is already here, and 
the power that is in large part responsible for it must start preparing now to step aside and let 
the Iraqis try to emerge from it.

Milan Rai
Justice Not Vengeance
landline 0845 458 9571 (UK) +44 1424 428 792 (int)
mobile phone (0)7980 748 555

Sent via the CASI-analysis mailing list
To unsubscribe, visit
All postings are archived on CASI's website at

[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]